prada infusion d iris doudoune prada pas cher paris femme france

prada infusion d iris deregulating more than 20 industries. An amendment to remove interior designers from Hukill's bill, backed by Saunders, failed on a 41 76 vote. Rep. Charles Van Zant, R Palatka, one of the leading social conservatives in the House, jumped across party lines to back the amendment, referring to his background as an architect andmaintaining that keeping interior designers regulated would help public safety. Saunders also introduced a series amendment to remove auctioneers, talent agencies, telemarketers, movers, charitable organizations, gyms and agents for athletes from the bill, which also all failed after little debate.The House Democratic office served notice on Wednesday that their caucus would oppose the budget."The $66.5 billion proposal is $4 billion less than the current year $70.5 billion budget," noted a memo from the House Democrats released on Wednesday. "The plan cuts spending on everything from public schools to affordable housing, road building, beach renourishment." The memo lashed out at the proposed House budget for raiding trust funds, eliminating the Florida Forever program, cutting 5,300 state jobs, hurting the middle class and cutting funds for education. With Democrats controlling 39 of the 120 seats in the House, their opposition is not expected to slow down the proposed budget.The House also advanced a measure reforming pension plans for state employees, preparing the stage for a vote on the proposal.Rep. Ritch Workman, R Melbourne, the chairman of the Community and Military Affairs Subcommittee and the sponsor of the legislation, took to the House floor to take questions on his proposal, which mandates that state employees place 3 percent of their salaries into the Florida Retirement System FRS.During a meeting of the Appropriations Committee last week, Saunders insisted that Workman's bill which requires a smaller contribution than the initial proposal that called for 5 percent was a tax. Saunders took up that line of attack on Wednesday."The bill refers to a contribution by employees," said Saunders, who asked if it was a mandatory contribution."It sounds like this is 3 percent of income," insisted Saunders. "How is this not an income