certified life coaches doudoune coach pas cher paris femme france

certified life coaches the company's goods below a set minimum violates the Sherman Antitrust Act. Proponents of a change argue that such requirements should not be categorically deemed violations but should be evaluated case by case, under a "rule of reason," to decide whether they interfere with market competition.Leegin Creative Leather Products is a California company that makes purses, belts and other accessories under the brand name Brighton. It said it would refuse to sell its goods to any retailer that didn't comply with its "Brighton Retail Pricing and Promotion Policy," which mostly bans discount prices for Brighton products.Leegin said "the typical retail strategy of putting products on and off 'sale' degrades a manufacturer's brand by causing customers to feel cheated when they buy at the wrong moment."But Kay's Kloset, a women's boutique in the Dallas suburb of Flower Mound, refused to abide by the rules and placed all of its Brighton products on sale. Leegin stopped selling to Kay's Kloset, the store's business suffered, and Kay's parent company, PSKS, sued.A jury, finding that Leegin's actions were automatically a violation of the Sherman Act, awarded Kay's Kloset $1.2 million, damages that were tripled because the actions violated antitrust laws. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld the ruling.Leegin contends in its brief to the court that the Dr. Miles decision is "premised upon the antiquated common law rule" and that it "squarely conflicts with the modern economic understanding that resale price maintenance agreements can have significant procompetitive effects."Such a free market